Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital

Liz Wang; Michel Apoj; Remington Lim; Shaun Wason; Mark Katz; David Wang

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital

Liz Wang, Michel Apoj, Remington Lim, Shaun Wason, Mark Katz, David Wang

Published in International Journal of Clinical Urology (Volume 5, Issue 1)

Received: 21 April 2021 Accepted: 3 May 2021 Published: 14 May 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Partial nephrectomy can be performed with traditional straight laparoscopy (SL), hand- assisted laparoscopic (HAL) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) techniques. The purpose of this study is to analyze trends in surgical technique and compare the intra- and post-operative outcomes at a safety net hospital. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of intra- and post-operative outcomes in partial nephrectomy cases between 2012 and 2018. We analyzed the impact of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and RENAL nephrometry score on surgical outcomes and post-operative complications among the three surgical approaches to partial nephrectomy. Of the 164 partial nephrectomies, 36 were SL, 65 HAL, and 63 RAL. Most SL was performed in the early years, whereas most RAL was performed in the later years, and HA was evenly distributed throughout the years. There was no difference in demographics, intra-operative complications, estimated blood loss, or positive margin rates between SL, HAL, and RAL. HAL partial nephrectomies had a higher RENAL nephrometry score and had statistically significant less warm ischemia and operative times when compared to RAL. HAL is a worthwhile technique in larger and more complex masses and especially in settings where robotic surgery is unable to be performed.

Published in	International Journal of Clinical Urology (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18
Page(s)	38-42
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Partial Nephrectomy, Laparoscopy, Robotics, Minimally Invasive Surgery, Renal Cell Carcinoma

References

[1]	Sun M, Bianchi M, Hansen J, et al. Chronic Kidney Disease After Nephrectomy in Patients with Small Renal Masses: A Retrospective Observational Analysis. Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 696-703.
[2]	Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, Jang TL, Russo P. Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy in Patients With Small Renal Tumors—Is There a Difference in Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes? J Urol. 2009; 181: 55-62.
[3]	Poppel H, Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A Prospective, Randomised EORTC Intergroup Phase 3 Study Comparing the Oncologic Outcome of Elective Nephron-Sparing Surgery and Radical Nephrectomy for Low-Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011; 59: 543-552.
[4]	Pierorazio P, Johnson M, Patel H, et al. Management of Renal Masses and Localized Renal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol. 2016; 162: 989-999.
[5]	Permpongkosol S, Bagga HS, Romero FR, et al. Trends in the operative management of renal tumours over a 14-year period. BJU Int. 2006; 98: 751-755.
[6]	Xia L, Talwar R, Taylor BL, et al. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015. Urology. 2019; 37: 182. e17-182. e27.
[7]	Marszalek M, Meixl H, Polajnar M, Rauchenwald M, Jeschke K, Madersbacher S. Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Matched-Pair Comparison of 200 Patients. Eur Urol. 2009; 55: 1171-1178.
[8]	Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomies for Single Renal Tumors. J Urol. 2001; 178: 41-46.
[9]	Lane BR, Gill IS. 5-Year Outcomes of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. J Urol. 2007; 177: 70-74.
[10]	American Cancer Society Medical and Editorial Content Team. (2020). Key Statistics About Kidney Cancer. American Cancer Society. [Accessed 2020 December 20]. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.org/cancer/kidney-cancer/about/key-statistics.html#written_by.
[11]	Almassi N, Gill BC, Rini B, Fareed K. Management of the small renal mass. Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6: 923-930.
[12]	SEER. (2020). Cancer Stat Facts: Kidney and Renal Pelvis Cancer. National Cancer Institute, NIH. [Accessed 2020 December 20]. Retrieved from https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/kidrp.html.
[13]	DeVoe WB, Kercher KW, Hope WW. et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after 60 cases: comparison with open partial nephrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23: 1075–1080.
[14]	Han K, Song G, You D, et al. Comparison of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic vs Robot- Assisted Laparoscopic vs Open Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with T1 Renal Masses. J Endourol. 2017; 31: 374-379.
[15]	Wolf JS, Moon TD, Nakada SY. Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Comparison to Standard Laparoscopic Nephrectomy. J Urol. 1998; 160: 22-27.
[16]	Nelson CP, Wolf JS. Comparison of Hand Assisted Versus Standard Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for Suspected Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Urol. 2002; 167: 1989-1994.
[17]	Venkatesh R, Belani JS, Chen C, et al. Prospective Randomized Comparison of Laparoscopic and Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy. Urology. 2007; 70: 873-877.
[18]	Jabaji RB, Fischer H, Kern T. Trend of Surgical Treatment of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma. Perm J. 2019; 23: 18-108.
[19]	Shah PH, Alom MA, Leibovich BC, et al. The Temporal Association of Robotic Surgical Diffusion with Overtreatment of the Small Renal Mass. J Urol. 2018; 200: 981-988.
[20]	Ghani KR, Sukumar S, Sammon JD, Rogers CG, Trinh Q, Menon M. Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Open and Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy Since the Introduction of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Results from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. J Urol. 2014; 191: 907-913.
[21]	Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes. J Urol. 2009; 182: 866-873.
[22]	Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 1023-1033.
[23]	Zargar H, Allaf ME, Bhayani S, et al. Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi-institutional study. BJU Int. 2014; 116: 407-414.
[24]	Elsamra SE, Leone AR, Lasser MS, et al. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes and Cost. J Endourol. 2013; 27: 182-188.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Liz Wang, Michel Apoj, Remington Lim, Shaun Wason, Mark Katz, et al. (2021). Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital. International Journal of Clinical Urology, 5(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Liz Wang; Michel Apoj; Remington Lim; Shaun Wason; Mark Katz, et al. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital. Int. J. Clin. Urol. 2021, 5(1), 38-42. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Liz Wang, Michel Apoj, Remington Lim, Shaun Wason, Mark Katz, et al. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital. Int J Clin Urol. 2021;5(1):38-42. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18,
  author = {Liz Wang and Michel Apoj and Remington Lim and Shaun Wason and Mark Katz and David Wang},
  title = {Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital},
  journal = {International Journal of Clinical Urology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {38-42},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcu.20210501.18},
  abstract = {Partial nephrectomy can be performed with traditional straight laparoscopy (SL), hand- assisted laparoscopic (HAL) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) techniques. The purpose of this study is to analyze trends in surgical technique and compare the intra- and post-operative outcomes at a safety net hospital. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of intra- and post-operative outcomes in partial nephrectomy cases between 2012 and 2018. We analyzed the impact of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and RENAL nephrometry score on surgical outcomes and post-operative complications among the three surgical approaches to partial nephrectomy. Of the 164 partial nephrectomies, 36 were SL, 65 HAL, and 63 RAL. Most SL was performed in the early years, whereas most RAL was performed in the later years, and HA was evenly distributed throughout the years. There was no difference in demographics, intra-operative complications, estimated blood loss, or positive margin rates between SL, HAL, and RAL. HAL partial nephrectomies had a higher RENAL nephrometry score and had statistically significant less warm ischemia and operative times when compared to RAL. HAL is a worthwhile technique in larger and more complex masses and especially in settings where robotic surgery is unable to be performed.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital
AU  - Liz Wang
AU  - Michel Apoj
AU  - Remington Lim
AU  - Shaun Wason
AU  - Mark Katz
AU  - David Wang
Y1  - 2021/05/14
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18
T2  - International Journal of Clinical Urology
JF  - International Journal of Clinical Urology
JO  - International Journal of Clinical Urology
SP  - 38
EP  - 42
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1355
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18
AB  - Partial nephrectomy can be performed with traditional straight laparoscopy (SL), hand- assisted laparoscopic (HAL) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) techniques. The purpose of this study is to analyze trends in surgical technique and compare the intra- and post-operative outcomes at a safety net hospital. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of intra- and post-operative outcomes in partial nephrectomy cases between 2012 and 2018. We analyzed the impact of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and RENAL nephrometry score on surgical outcomes and post-operative complications among the three surgical approaches to partial nephrectomy. Of the 164 partial nephrectomies, 36 were SL, 65 HAL, and 63 RAL. Most SL was performed in the early years, whereas most RAL was performed in the later years, and HA was evenly distributed throughout the years. There was no difference in demographics, intra-operative complications, estimated blood loss, or positive margin rates between SL, HAL, and RAL. HAL partial nephrectomies had a higher RENAL nephrometry score and had statistically significant less warm ischemia and operative times when compared to RAL. HAL is a worthwhile technique in larger and more complex masses and especially in settings where robotic surgery is unable to be performed.
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Liz Wang

Department of Urology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
Michel Apoj

Department of Urology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
Remington Lim

Department of Urology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
Shaun Wason

Department of Urology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
Mark Katz

Department of Urology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
David Wang

Department of Urology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Liz Wang, Michel Apoj, Remington Lim, Shaun Wason, Mark Katz, et al. (2021). Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital. International Journal of Clinical Urology, 5(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Liz Wang; Michel Apoj; Remington Lim; Shaun Wason; Mark Katz, et al. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital. Int. J. Clin. Urol. 2021, 5(1), 38-42. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Liz Wang, Michel Apoj, Remington Lim, Shaun Wason, Mark Katz, et al. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital. Int J Clin Urol. 2021;5(1):38-42. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18,
  author = {Liz Wang and Michel Apoj and Remington Lim and Shaun Wason and Mark Katz and David Wang},
  title = {Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital},
  journal = {International Journal of Clinical Urology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {38-42},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcu.20210501.18},
  abstract = {Partial nephrectomy can be performed with traditional straight laparoscopy (SL), hand- assisted laparoscopic (HAL) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) techniques. The purpose of this study is to analyze trends in surgical technique and compare the intra- and post-operative outcomes at a safety net hospital. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of intra- and post-operative outcomes in partial nephrectomy cases between 2012 and 2018. We analyzed the impact of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and RENAL nephrometry score on surgical outcomes and post-operative complications among the three surgical approaches to partial nephrectomy. Of the 164 partial nephrectomies, 36 were SL, 65 HAL, and 63 RAL. Most SL was performed in the early years, whereas most RAL was performed in the later years, and HA was evenly distributed throughout the years. There was no difference in demographics, intra-operative complications, estimated blood loss, or positive margin rates between SL, HAL, and RAL. HAL partial nephrectomies had a higher RENAL nephrometry score and had statistically significant less warm ischemia and operative times when compared to RAL. HAL is a worthwhile technique in larger and more complex masses and especially in settings where robotic surgery is unable to be performed.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Management of Small Renal Masses at a Safety Net Hospital
AU  - Liz Wang
AU  - Michel Apoj
AU  - Remington Lim
AU  - Shaun Wason
AU  - Mark Katz
AU  - David Wang
Y1  - 2021/05/14
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18
T2  - International Journal of Clinical Urology
JF  - International Journal of Clinical Urology
JO  - International Journal of Clinical Urology
SP  - 38
EP  - 42
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1355
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20210501.18
AB  - Partial nephrectomy can be performed with traditional straight laparoscopy (SL), hand- assisted laparoscopic (HAL) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) techniques. The purpose of this study is to analyze trends in surgical technique and compare the intra- and post-operative outcomes at a safety net hospital. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of intra- and post-operative outcomes in partial nephrectomy cases between 2012 and 2018. We analyzed the impact of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and RENAL nephrometry score on surgical outcomes and post-operative complications among the three surgical approaches to partial nephrectomy. Of the 164 partial nephrectomies, 36 were SL, 65 HAL, and 63 RAL. Most SL was performed in the early years, whereas most RAL was performed in the later years, and HA was evenly distributed throughout the years. There was no difference in demographics, intra-operative complications, estimated blood loss, or positive margin rates between SL, HAL, and RAL. HAL partial nephrectomies had a higher RENAL nephrometry score and had statistically significant less warm ischemia and operative times when compared to RAL. HAL is a worthwhile technique in larger and more complex masses and especially in settings where robotic surgery is unable to be performed.
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download